MoviePass Returns After Its Disastrous, Comical Implosion LAPD Adopts Some (Weak) Surveillance Tech Reforms That Will Finally Allow Public Input This Week In Techdirt History: August 21st - 27th New FCC Broadband Maps Are A Bit Of A 'Train Wreck'įunniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt Senator Klobuchar's Latest Bad Idea: Letting Smaller Journalism Outlets Demand Payments For LinksĪge Verification Providers Say Don't Worry About California Design Code You'll Just Have To Scan Your Face For Every Website You Visitĭaily Deal: Code Direct Python Interactive CodingĪppeals Court Tells Government It Needs Actual Evidence If It Wants To Keep The $70,000 It Seized During An Accident Investigation The system was intentionally designed this way. Yet the system prevents individuals from doing the same to corporations because there are punishments for intentional takedown notices, so an individual who issues a bogus takedown on corporate content will more than likely be punished for intentionally doing so. We need a legal system that encourages them to ensure they do have copyprivileges on something before issuing a takedown and that sanctions huge punishment for those who issue takedowns on content they do not own, regardless of whether it was intentional or not. They can simply create bogus takedowns and, if they later find they do not have the copyprivilege, they can then claim ignorance and not be punished.

These corporations are too lazy to even check and see if they hold a copyright on something before issuing a takedown and they lobby for a legal system that gives them no incentive to do so.

And this is one of the problems with our copyprivilege system, it favor big lazy corporations and enables them to shoot first and ask questions later requiring people to be held guilty of infringement until proven innocent.

Youtube musica beyonce single ladies